https://pecunia2016.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/aaron-burden-tYm4_ggmevU-unsplash-1500x1124.jpg
Straw polls amongst networking groups, media coverage in the wake of the Carillion collapse and even the Chancellor of The Exchequer highlighting the “continuing scourge of late payments” in the Spring Statement delivered on 13 March 2018 mean the issue of customers paying their suppliers late is still a major ‘pain point’ for businesses today.
Prompt Payment Code
Small businesses, via the Federation of Small Businesses (“FSB”), and others are putting pressure on the government to address this problem and have been for some time. Arising from this, The Prompt Payment Code (“PPC”) was launched in 2008 and this, in effect, laid down a set of principles for businesses that commits them to paying suppliers fairly and on time. I use the word “fairly” because research undertaken by Siemens Financial Services last year revealed that businesses with a turnover of less than £1million were waiting an average of 72 days to be paid whilst those with a turnover of between £1million and £10million were being paid within 53-54 days.
The PPC was welcomed and continues to take on more signatories to the Code. However, having discovered that Carillion had been a signatory since 2013 has led to calls for the PPC to be made more robust, with even penalties being awarded against firms that have ‘signed up’ yet do not comply with the principles.
Payment Practices and Performance Reporting
In addition, a new statutory duty to report on supplier payment practices was introduced last year with the aim of boosting transparency for SMEs who provide goods and/or services to large companies and LLPs. The duty applies to all accounting years from 6 April 2017 and the businesses to which this applies have to provide information on their standard payment terms and their procedures with dealing with queries with suppliers, the average number of days they take to make payment and a breakdown by percentage of how many invoices they pay within 30 days, between 31 and 60 days and in excess of 60 days.
Failure to disclose this information could lead to companies being fined but, again, it all sounds well and good but with the first set of reports due to be available it would seem that a large number of businesses have failed to disclose this information. Even more alarming is that of those who have responded only 29% paid their suppliers within 30 days from the June to November 2017 period.
Therefore, what else can businesses do to try and protect themselves? The government will, I am sure, address these matters surrounding the recent initiatives described above but we cannot just sit around waiting. As alluded to in my header, firms do have the option to withdraw credit facilities from late-paying customers and even pursue their claim through the Courts. However, this should still be last resort as I believe we should take some responsibility in order to try and mitigate the instances and effects of late payment…
What can you do?
As the FSB research has already revealed, around 50,000 businesses fail each year owing to the effect on cash flow caused by late payment – don’t let your business be added to this statistic.
©Pecunia(2016)LTD